The debate will never be resolved. Sports analysts and fans will never be able to agree on who are the greatest players or teams in any given sport. The problem goes back long before weeding through and sorting out statistics. The problem starts with the definition. How does one define “great”?
Does greatest mean the most championship rings, because there are plenty of players who were not superstars, but who had the privilege of being shuffled around and playing on multiple championship teams. Does greatest mean the best statistics? If so, which statistics matter the most, and what if someone has great statistics but no rings? Does greatest mean record-holder in any given statistical category? What if a player dominates in only one statistical category, but is mediocre, at best, in others? And what about sports where different players play entirely different positions – a great lineman on the football field cannot be compared to a great quarterback by using the same metrics for greatness. It’s impossible to nail down the greatest, because it’s impossible to agree on the definition of greatest.
Part of the reason Jesus’ words from Luke 12 are so striking is that we’re not naturally on the same page when defining the word peace. Just as rabid sports fans will become rather unruly when discussing who is the greatest, should it surprise us that issues are also going to arise if no two people are able to agree on a definition of peace? How does one define it? Absence of conflict? Tolerance? Complete agreement? Indifference? If two people cannot even agree on a definition of peace, then it is really difficult to imagine how peace could be achieved.
How does the world define peace? The world has its own version of peace, but it isn’t easy to come by. Peace, as our culture has come to define it, is what happens when you agree with me on a matter. So for peace to exist between two individuals, each requires that the other side shares their same opinion. It isn’t acceptable anymore for someone merely to keep their opinion to themselves or choose not to get involved and just let others do as they wish; no, peace will only come when you see things my way and are willing to let go of your “wrong” opinion on a matter. How likely do you suppose it will be to achieve peace with that understanding?
How do believers define it? We talk about it. We sing about it. The Bible discusses it, but that doesn’t matter too much if you have your own working definition of peace. I think we know that peace doesn’t mean that Christians will get a pass on problems in life, but still we find ourselves struggling perhaps more than we should when the going gets tough. We still slip into that transactional understanding of our relationship with God: so long as we do the things Christians are supposed to do – go to church, pray, read our Bible – that sort of thing, then God will keep the trouble off our radar and his favor flowing freely, and for the most part, we’ll be at peace.
Or we may have a rather simplistic, hardly-scratch-the-surface understanding of peace. Peace means Jesus has forgiven my sins. This is true! But knowing it and living and breathing it are different things. If I don’t live in that peace that flows from the forgiveness of sins but shelve it instead, how much will peace really characterize my life?
When we take a hard pass on the peace of Jesus in favor of pursuing the perfect partner, do we wonder why we’re restless? When we put our family and kid schedules in place of the peace of Jesus, are we surprised that stress and chaos carry the day? When we worry endlessly about money and focus on our possessions, where does peace have a place at the table?
Are you ready to consider how God defines peace? What does his Word reveal about his definition of peace? Try this on for size: “He was delivered over to death for our sins and was raised to life for our justification. Therefore, since we have been justified through faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom we have gained access by faith into this grace in which we now stand” (Romans 4:25-5:2). Paul here gets right at the root of the problem by pointing out the reason Jesus had to be delivered over to death: our sins. Our sin smacks God in the face and undermines any sort of relationship with him. It is a wrong that must be made right, but as the wrongdoers, we cannot help ourselves because the only thing we’re capable of is smacking God in the face again and again with our sin. How can peace exist in such a scenario? It can’t!
Jesus had to bring it. By his death then, he righted the wrong of our sin, making payment in full, and because of Jesus’ resurrection, God determined that we are no longer guilty, since all of our wrongs have been righted in Christ. We now stand in grace, not guilt.
So the peace we have with God is like this: imagine two circles. One circle is guilt. The other circle is grace. While in unbelief, we stand in the circle of guilt, because of our sin. But when we come to faith, believing in Jesus and what he has done for us, we embrace that God says we no longer stand in that circle – the circle of guilt. Instead, we stand in the other circle, the circle of grace. So peace with God means no guilt, just grace.
Let’s now revisit Jesus’ words to us, the hard truth he expressed in Luke 12. “Do you think I came to bring peace on earth? No, I tell you, but division” (v.51). When we consider the words of Isaiah 9:6 (where Jesus is referred to as the Prince of Peace) and the rejoicing of the angels at Jesus’ birth, Jesus’ words here certainly appear to contradict them!
But let’s apply the understanding we just gained from God’s definition of peace from Romans 4. Even though Jesus was delivered over to death for the sins of all people, allowing God to declare all sinners not guilty, those who don’t believe it remain standing in the guilty circle. However, those who believe all that Jesus has said and done as their Savior stand in the circle of grace.
Now picture that. Two different circles – one of guilt and one of grace – are filled with only two different categories of people: those who believe and those who don’t. What is the result? Division. There is a division between those who rejoice in the peace Jesus came to bring and those who refuse it.
So did Jesus come to bring the division? Yes, because he was responsible for bringing the peace that would be rejected by many in the world. So the division is Jesus’ fault in the same way that it is dad’s fault for taking the whole family out for ice cream. One child was in a pouty mood and stubbornly decided he didn’t want any. However, after seeing everyone else enjoy theirs, suddenly he determined it wasn’t fair that everyone else got some and put up a stink about it. That division wouldn’t have come if dad had not taken the family out for ice cream! So, in that sense, yes, it’s dad’s fault.
When the division of which Jesus speaks comes into the picture then, it stems from those who don’t want the peace he came to bring, but then decide it’s not fair that others would want it or have it and puts up a stink about it. And, as Jesus described, this kind of division goes deeper than just a group of Christians and those outside in the unbelieving world. It often hits home and we experience the division right under our own roof.
And Jesus knew that division would happen. Jesus didn’t look forward to it, but he knew it would happen. It wouldn’t be pleasant, but he knew it would happen. That’s what he meant when he lamented, “I have come to bring fire on the earth, and how I wish it were already kindled! But I have a baptism to undergo, and what constraint I am under until it is completed!” (v.49-50). Jesus came to save sinners, and he knew the grueling payment that was required of him to make that happen. But he also knew something else that would be equally agonizing: in order for sinners to be saved, they must first acknowledge they need saving. The refining fire of repentance needs to do its work. But many will refuse to acknowledge their need for repentance over any wrongdoing or sin against God. That’s why wherever Jesus is, division is right there with him.
And wherever the church is doing the work Jesus entrusted to it, division will result, just as he promised. Not only is this a hard truth because it hits close to home for many of us; it’s a hard truth because it is an undeniable reality of the ministry of the church. We are called to bring peace, yet God prepares us for the hard work of ministry by telling us that our efforts will result in division. We experience that kind of division as we live out our faith and seek to bring peace to others in our own personal mission field. That division will result when certain teachings turn others off and away from a congregation. That division will happen in a school ministry when the values or beliefs of families don’t always align with the mission of the school. Ministry involves many challenges, so Jesus warns us that we can count division among those challenges as we proclaim peace.
But as long as we proclaim peace by his definition – peace that comes from being justified (declared “not guilty”) and peace that means standing in grace – then we have nothing to worry about. Jesus himself proclaimed peace and he was rejected. Those following in his footsteps will not be surprised to experience the same rejection. And we will have thick skin when we do. Why? Because we know and believe God’s definition of peace, and that through Jesus, that is exactly what we have. About that there is no doubt and no debate.